|
|
|
 |
|
Ismant el-Kharab |
|
| |
The ancient town of Kellis, situated 2km to the east of the modern
village of Ismant (or Smint), is now known as Ismant el-Kharab,
meaning ‘Ismant the ruined’. The mudbrick tombs, temples and
settlement remains of Kellis, can be seen from the road at a point
about 20km east of Mut. The large site has been investigated in recent
years by a team from the Dakhla Oasis Project and is considered one of
the most important archaeological sites in the oasis. |
| |
|
|
| |
Inhabited for seven centuries, Kellis was once a thriving and
well-populated market town and the past two decades of excavation has
uncovered a wealth of Roman and Coptic remains, including houses,
churches, wells, a bath-house, storage buildings, aqueducts and a
cemetery of free-standing tombs. This is another site where a deep
covering of sand has served to preserve many of the structures up to a
height of 2 to 4m and its importance is seen in terms of what it has
revealed of the emergence of Christianity in Roman Egypt. The
settlement is still being studied by several teams and has been found
to contain many interesting structures, mostly from the Roman and
Christian eras as well as important cultural objects such as
bedsprings, pottery and basketry. Thousands of literary texts and
religious writings in Greek and Coptic on papyrus fragments have been
discovered in the domestic site which indicate a great diversity of
beliefs. Gnostic papyri relate to the presence of a Manichaean
community there by AD 300, offering a unique version of Christianity
as taught by the followers of the prophet Mani, alongside the more
orthodox Catholic faith which had begun to spread throughout Egypt.
Three mudbrick churches have been found at Kellis, one of them has
been securely dated to the 4th century AD by a hoard of coins found
there and is said to be the oldest Christian church in Egypt.
Although wooden notebooks were a rare commodity in Egypt, three such
objects (known as the Kellis codices) have been found at the site. Two
of them, complete with their original binding chords, are the
best-preserved examples of wooden books known from this period and
help us to understand the gradual transition from papyrus scrolls to
books. One of the documents consists of nine wooden boards containing
speeches and political instructions, while a second, on eight leaves
documents farming records and accounts - payments in kind by tenant
farmers to absentee landlords. A third single board, written in Greek
is a contract of sale for a house - this is how we know that the
settlement was called Kellis and that Dakhla existed as a separate
administrative centre from Kharga. These codices can now be seen in
Kharga Heritage Museum. |
| |
|
|
| |
A large mudbrick walled area to the south-west of the settlement
encloses two small stone temples, a number of mudbrick shrines and
various storage buildings, dating from the 1st century AD and probably
the Emperor Hadrian. The complex has been under investigation since
1991 and the most recent excavations have revealed Ptolemaic ceramics,
perhaps giving the site an even earlier date. The largest temple to
the east contains three parallel sanctuaries, the side chambers and
the offering hall in front had vaulted ceilings and the central
sanctuary was encased in stone. Outer walls were decorated with
engaged columns but reliefs survive only in small fragments, as this
and the smaller temple were quarried for their stone. By contrast the
larger of the mudbrick shrines (Shrine I), which may have functioned
as a mammisi, has much of its original painted decoration intact. In
this structure, located to the south of the main temple, there are two
chambers, the inner one having a beautiful painted vaulted ceiling
which collapsed in antiquity and was buried by sand until the current
excavations. Archaeologists are currently piecing together the
fragmentary jig-saw of painted plaster, reconstructing the ceiling on
paper and working towards a restoration. Decorations in the plastered
inner chamber of Shrine I were painted in a mixture of Pharaonic and
Classical style, interesting for their information on artistic
development during this period. |
| |
|
|
| |
The two temples and the shrines were dedicated to the god Tutu and the
goddesses Neith and Tapsais. Tutu (Tithoes), an obscure god venerated
in Graeco-Roman times, was a son of Neith and held the title ‘Master
of Demons’. He was also called ‘he who keeps enemies at a distance’
and was believed to provide protection from hostile forces and evil
demons. Tutu was depicted in the form of a walking lion or a sphinx,
sometimes with a human head, the wings of a bird and the tail of a
snake. His monuments at Kellis are the only known remains of a cult
centre for this god. Other deities depicted in Shrine I at Kellis
include Amun-Re, Mut, Khons, Thoth and Nehmetaway, who are also
venerated at the Dakhla Temple of Deir el-Hagar and possibly at
Amheida. In other areas of decoration in Shrine I, groups of deities
include Osiris ‘Lord of the Oasis’, Harsiese, Isis and Nephthys as
well as Amun-Nakht (also seen at Ain Birbiya), Khnum, Isis and Hathor
- it is in fact an inventory of all the main deities represented in
Dakhla Oasis.
Hundreds of burials have been collectively excavated from major
cemeteries around Ismant el-Kharab, especially in two main areas to
the north of the town, ranging in date from around 300 BC to AD 300.
There have been many mummies recovered from Ptolemaic Period burials,
complete with cartonnage coffins, while other stone-blocked tombs
contained linen-wrapped bodies placed in tomb-chambers without
coffins. Many more bodies were found to have been buried in a cemetery
to the west of the site - some in very unusual circumstances. A team
from the Dakhla Oasis Project engaged in studying the burials from
Ismant el-Kharab found many composite mummies, prepared by taking
parts from different bodies and wrapping them on a wooden rack to
resemble a single traditional mummified burial.
Kellis seems to have been abandoned sometime around the end the 4th
century AD during the Roman-Byzantine Period. Evidence has been found
to suggest that until then it was an area of heavy trading with many
people coming and going, and perhaps like other settlements in the
oases, a place of banishment. |
| |
| Top |
|